Skip to main content
FreeAIList

Editorial policy

How FreeAIList verifies tools and free offers

Every published factual claim should be traceable to evidence. Unclear facts remain unknown or under review rather than being guessed.

Last updated October 17, 2026

Research credits, tests and date labels

Guides and practical tool notes are credited to FreeAIList, our independent publishing project. The project owner’s identity is not a claim that the owner personally tested every listing. AI can assist research and drafting; a named tester or reviewer should be credited only when the recorded work supports that credit.

  • Documentation review: we read the stated sources. It does not establish successful signup, generation, downloads, speed or a measured quota.
  • Completed test: the page should identify what actually worked and its important settings and limits. One result does not prove universal access or performance.
  • Failed or blocked attempt: we disclose the observed failure without presenting it as a completed result or assuming the cause.
  • Provider demo or untested example: provider artwork and suggested prompts remain distinct from our own completed tests.

Published is the guide’s publication date. Guide updated records a known edit to that guide. Sources checked or a guide’s source-verification date applies to the stated research scope. The separate tool catalog’s Last verified date is not renewed by adding a practical guide, changing links or rebuilding the website.

When public sources conflict, the disputed fact remains unknown or under review. Earlier catalog fields may be shown as a labelled historical snapshot; that is not confirmation of current access. Provider policy pages also need their effective date checked before they are described as current rules.

Structured data should describe the publisher, content and dates visible on the page. It is not evidence of a successful test, a product rating or guaranteed placement in search results.

Source priority

We prefer evidence in this order:

  • Official pricing pages and product documentation.
  • Official help centers, release notes, and company announcements.
  • Direct statements from the provider that can be independently checked.
  • Reliable secondary sources only when official wording is incomplete.

Search snippets, copied directory entries, and unsourced social posts are not enough to establish a free allowance or expiration date.

Verification workflow

  • Identify the exact claim a visitor needs to understand.
  • Check the provider’s current official source and record its address.
  • Separate recurring free plans, one-time credits, trials, and deals.
  • Record important restrictions and the actual date checked.
  • Keep uncertain or conflicting information out of published facts.
  • Preserve evidence and review meaningful changes before publication.

What our verification labels mean

  • Source verified: the published claim is supported by a current official pricing page, document, or provider announcement.
  • Owner confirmed: the site owner observed the stated account behavior directly; this label is used only when that happened.
  • Needs rechecking: the evidence changed, failed a scheduled check, or became too old to support an active promotion confidently.

Source verification does not mean we personally created an account and tested every feature. Personal testing is optional supporting evidence, not a requirement for publication, and it never replaces an official source.

Dates, stale information, and expired deals

“Last verified” means the supporting evidence was actually checked—not simply that a page was rebuilt. Listings checked 90 days ago or more receive a stale warning until reviewed again.

Offers with a published deadline leave active results automatically at that deadline. Undated temporary offers receive a shorter source-recheck window; if the source changes or cannot be rechecked in time, the offer leaves public active results for review. We do not use fake countdowns, artificial scarcity, or “updated today” labels unrelated to a real check.

How automation and AI assist

Automation can revisit source pages, detect content changes, queue reviews, and remove an offer from active results when its deadline or review window passes. AI may help summarize evidence and draft original copy, but it does not silently overwrite published facts or approve a changed offer. Important facts remain tied to source evidence and uncertain changes stay under review.

Original editorial value

Listings are not copied marketing blurbs. We summarize what the tool does, who the free offer suits, what can block practical use, and when a competing option may be better. We avoid publishing large numbers of thin pages solely to target search terms.

Advertising and commercial influence

Advertising, affiliate relationships, free access, gifts, or outreach from a provider do not buy a positive verdict or bypass verification. Any future affiliate relationship or sponsored placement will be labeled clearly.

Corrections

Supported corrections are reviewed against current official evidence. When a material published fact changes, we update the listing and its verified date; uncertain changes remain under review. Send corrections through our contact page. Include the affected page and a current official source.